Administration For Community Living Program

The ACL Business Acumen Learning Collaborative2 is a community-level effort to improve the business acumen of the organizations and agencies that provide community-based services. Greenlee noted the tremendous support that The John A. Hartford Foundation and The SCAN Foundation have given as ACL has worked to change the network of services it supports and to make previously free services more sustainable in an uncertain funding climate. "We are taking a national network of nonprofits—the area agencies on aging centers for independent living—and changing their fundamental business structure," Greenlee said. "Not their mission, not their value, not their contribution, their structure." These are primarily grant-based organizations that receive money from the federal government via the states and the Older Americans Act, she explained.

They are learning to become providers, to demonstrate their economic value, and to bill for their services. Possible opportunities include establishing meal providers that hospitals can contract with to deliver meals to the home of someone recently released from the hospital. Other services that might be able to generate fees rather than subsist on grants include community-based transportation networks and case management.

There is still a role for services that are provided free of charge, Greenlee said. The challenge is that there is an assumption that all of the free community services are plentiful and will continue to be available for the clients of large long-term care providers, managed-care organizations, and hospital systems, even in an uncertain funding climate. As the Obama Administration comes to a close, Greenlee and her colleagues at HHS have been working on a proposed budget for 2017. One question the Office of Management and Budget has asked was why the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services is not doing this work.

ACL administers an array of Older Americans Act-funded programs, such as its chronic disease self-management education programs, through grant making to the aging network. The Positive Self-Management Program, developed at Stanford University, is offered to older adults with HIV in Maine through one ACL grantee, and there are other health and wellness programs that grantees have tailored and packaged for older adults living with HIV. Additionally, ACL's Office of Healthcare Information and Counseling manages the State Health Insurance Assistance Program . SHIP counsels Medicare-eligible individuals to assist them with making informed health insurance decisions, which is helpful to those who are receiving Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program services. Lastly, ACL's resource centers support grantees' work with targeted populations to provide services to historically underserved minority communities.

In particular, the SAGE National Resource Center on LGBT Aging provides HIV and aging resources to ACL's grantees and the communities they serve. Whether it be home modification, transportation to medical appointments, or caregiver and home delivery meal services, all of ACL's programs "can be of benefit to people over 60 with HIV," as noted by Andrea. During the course of ACL's work on improving business acumen and the coordination of LTSS, four key issues have emerged that should be kept in mind as this work moves forward, Greenlee said. "If we monetize , people will have to know that they are buying something that has an outcome that they want," she said. However, she said, focusing on quality outcomes is hard for the aging services network because of its historic emphasis on outputs, not outcomes.

For example, when ACL instituted a requirement that states and area agencies could only spend Older Americans Act funds on evidence-based programs, there was some resistance. This requirement was a signal that an exercise program at a senior center could not be created just because someone volunteered to run it. The exercise program must have fidelity and be replicated with outcomes that are proven, Greenlee explained. Toward this end, HHS has asked the National Quality Forum to identify the domains needed for quality measures of LTSS. NQF has already identified person-centeredness as one of the necessary domains.

The next step, Greenlee said, is to invest in research to populate these domains with data. Although some data are available at the local level, the research for home- and community-based services needs to be taken to a much larger scale. The Division for Community Living partners with more than 60 community based organizations that look to the agency for oversight and funding.

She said that to do this work effectively, it is necessary to be able to live with dissonance. Disability and aging, for example, both have a history of stigma and discrimination, but they are not the same history, and civil rights factors into the field of disability in a way that it does not in aging. Therefore, bridging the fields of aging and disability requires patience, good intentions, and a lot of discussion about fundamental issues and clear communication about meaning. "The goal is not to think the same way or to be the same at all, but to have and articulate the same objectives," Greenlee said. ACL has a shared vision of what it means to be an autonomous person living in the community with a need for both prevention services and supports.

Greenlee cautioned that it is possible to get lost in the complexities of distinguishing between the different fields but to remain respectful and comfortable living with the differences. She said that ACL has changed some of the language it uses to accommodate the differences in how the aging and disability communities think and talk about "choice," living in community "for a lifetime," and end-of-life care. She said that disability and aging work will not be the same, but there are opportunities because they share common threats and common goals, such as the threat of the medical community dictating how individuals should live their lives and the goal of individuals living their lives how they want them to be. The third key issue relates to technology and, in particular, the development of interoperable electronic health record systems. Greenlee pointed to research on care transitions, funded by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, as evidence that the lack of access that community-based organizations have to EHRs is a fundamental barrier to these organizations successfully moving forward.

In some cases local organizations, such as the Area Agency on Aging in San Diego County—an aging and disability resource center—have gone so far as to build their own systems to interface with regional hospitals. It's not part of what the Office of the National Coordinator does," said Greenlee. "Technology will keep the aging network and disability programs and local communities . At the starting gate if we don't talk about it, because no one is investing in ," said Greenlee. Greenlee began the discussion by offering a possible explanation for the concerns Alkema presented that highlighted the disconnect between what Americans believe and the realities of aging and disability.

Greenlee suggested that the disconnect results from individuals' feelings about the concept of independence. If admitting that they need care means that they will lose their independence, then they will not admit that they need care. However, if the question of independence and needing care is reframed by asking people what services they require to remain independent, then they make every effort to maintain their independence.

She noted that the World Health Organization released a report that frames health as an issue of functional ability because of the way functional ability is linked to independence. Similarly, hypertension itself does not affect independence, but having a stroke that results in paralysis will affect functional ability and independence. To provide a framework for the workshop's discussions, two keynote speakers talked about what maximizing independence and community living mean, the successes that have already been achieved, the challenges that lie ahead, and suggestions for how to meet those challenges.

Kathy Greenlee, the Administrator of the Administration for Community Living and the Assistant Secretary for Aging in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services , gave a keynote presentation on the history and current state of the federal government's efforts to support community living and independence. Gretchen Alkema, the Vice President for Policy and Communications at The SCAN Foundation, then discussed the contrast between how Americans perceive issues of aging, disability, and independence and the realities of these issues. This webinar is the most recent installment of a series created in partnership with ACL, CDC, the Health Resources and Services Administration, and the National Institute on Aging. The September webinar will explore unique end of life care considerations for individuals with dementia. The presentation will include sections on evidence and goal based decision making, palliative care, partnering with staff and families to improve advance care planning for residents of VA community living centers with dementia, and the indigenous perspective on end of life.

Kathy Greenlee of ACL and HHS began her presentation by recounting how when she first began working as the Assistant Secretary for Aging in 2009, HHS was putting together working groups to prepare for what would eventually become known as the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act1 . She recalled how she and Henry Claypool, who was then Secretary Kathleen Sebelius's advisor on disability policy, would receive the lists of those who were to be members of the working groups, and neither one of them would be included. "That was troubling to us and also an early warning that health reform was not long-term care reform," Greenlee said. Although long-term care reform is occurring, she added, it was not organized that way, nor was there recognition of the connection to community-based work on aging and disability.

It was for this reason that Greenlee, Claypool, and Sharon Lewis—then the Administrator of the Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities—worked to create ACL. They envisioned ACL as the agency at HHS where the voices of older adults and people with disabilities would be heard in the health reform conversations. Join this webinar to learn about COVID-19 vaccine resources expanding access to people with disabilities.

Acting Administrator and Assistant Secretary for Aging Alison Barkoff will kick off the event. The webinar will highlight the Disability Information & Access Line , ACL's disability network, and other disability organizations that that support a range of communities across the country. The event will also hightlight innovative local partnerships and ways to overcome vaccination barriers. CMS, Greenlee explained, interfaces with state Medicaid agencies, which are essentially insurance finance companies and not program agencies.

Although some at CMS know what work ACL does at the community level, those involved with Medicare or the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation generally do not. To provide independent living services to individuals with significant disabilities to assist them to function more independently in family and community settings, by developing and supporting a statewide network of centers for independent living. The Administration for Community Living , as part of the Department of Health and Human Services, works with states, tribes, and an extensive network of advocates and service providers to help older adults and people of all ages with disabilities live independently and participate fully in their communities. New Editions provides data design and analytical support to the Office of Performance and Evaluation in the Administration for Community Living . ACL's mission is to maximize the independence, well-being and health of older adults, people with disabilities across the lifespan and their families and caregivers.

OPE coordinates a range of data collection and analysis activities and disseminates data through a variety of modalities, including the AGing, Independence, and Disability Program Data Portal. When 100 million Americans are undergoing individual personal realignments at the same time, the opportunity arises to create a societal movement for change. The nation will not solve the challenges created by the discontinuity between the myth and reality of aging and disability using current tools for individual personal planning. Although the delivery and financing systems for long-term care should be considered as separate and unique, as also mentioned by Greenlee, they are still connected. Tools that can exist in both systems are needed to support the systems in meaningful ways for the benefit of the public.

The other significant stride forward that ACL has made, with strong support from CMS and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, is a state-level effort to help improve the coordination of LTSS. ACL has taken the core principles of what CMS has done with its "no wrong door" approach for beneficiaries to gain access to CMS services and is working to extend a similar model to the entire range of aging and disability services. She cited the collaboration between the Partners in Care Foundation and Blue Shield of California as one example of how states are designing programs so that they can provide a modest amount of help to individuals earlier, which may delay or prevent individuals from ever needing to enter the Medicaid system.

The Administration for Community Living supports the needs of the aging and disability populations, and improves access health care and long-term services. The COVID-19 pandemic has changed how essential services are offered to vulnerable populations, and ACL is no exception. Funding for meals usually provided in congregate settings were redirected to home delivery and grab-and-go services. Programming for chronic disease self-management education and falls prevention shifted to online class formats, which created an opportunity for innovation and expanded the classes' reach to populations in rural areas and individuals with transportation access challenges. ACL also received additional funding regarding vaccine access for individuals who needed either transportation to vaccine sites, or the vaccine administered in their homes.

Even more surprising, she said, is that the percentage of poll respondents who held this belief increased substantially between the 2013 poll and the 2015 poll. One possible reason for this concerning trend, she suggested, is that it is driven by those who are 40 to 45 years old and are just beginning to experience the consequences of aging in their own families. Another possible reason, based on anecdotal observations from other health-related polls, is that these results have been affected by the economic recovery in the United States. Regardless of the reason, Alkema said, these results represent an enormous problem regarding Americans' awareness of the impending impact of an aging population. How Americans think about aging and disability matters, Gretchen Alkema of The SCAN Foundation told the workshop audience. It affects the conversations that those working in the field have with each other, with policy makers at the state and local levels, and with the general public.

All of this led Alkema to question what should be done to bring the issues of aging, disability, and independence out of the recesses of people's minds and out of the bedroom conversations of "What are we going to do about mom? Although Americans are beginning to recognize that these issues are part of their lives, they are still not entirely clear about what actions to take, and they sometimes wonder whether anyone else is struggling with the same challenges. No Wrong Door Virginia is a virtual system and statewide network of shared resources, designed to streamline access to long-term services and supports – connecting individuals, providers and communities across the Commonwealth. DARS is committed to having livable communities for those who want to age in place or transition from facilities to community settings with long-term supports and services. We work with local Area Agencies on Aging as well as various other public and private organizations to help older Virginians, their families and loved ones find the services and information they need. In particular, she noted the absurdity of large amounts of money having been invested in research collecting data on disability, functional status, and the use of assistive technology when the research tends to study people only up until they reach age 65 or else the study population only begins at age 65.

This webinar will discuss the connection between brain health and dementia, and share resources from ACL to help raise awareness about the significance of brain health. Participants will hear from two ACL dementia grantees, Summit County Public Health in Ohio and AltaMed Health Services Corporation in California, as they talk about why they provide education on brain health in their communities and healthcare systems. This toolkit is an introduction for staff at centers for independent living and their community partners who are interested in developing curriculums or trainings that meet the unique needs and goals of Independent Living.

It provides instructions and guidance on how to use Participatory Curriculum Development to create new ways of supporting Independent Living skills education and development. The Brain Injury Services Coordination Unit serves as a point of contact for internal and external customers seeking general or agency-specific information about brain injury resources. Patti Goodall, Program Director of the BISC Unit , talks about the three-year, $900,000 grant that will enhance access to services and supports for Virginians with traumatic brain injury. Our division has a number of programs which offer supports and services for for Virginians with diabilities in living independently and to increase the individual's control in life and ability to perform everyday activities on or off the job.

Through coordination across multiple projects, New Editions works collaboratively to provide expert technical assistance and guidance to the Administration for Community Living , their grantees and partners, and other Aging Services Network organizations at the state, sub-state and community levels. Under a subcontract with The Lewin Group, New Editions coordinates relevant ACL activities with the initiatives of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Money Follows the Person Technical Assistance Center. New Editions provides the Office of Performance and Evaluation within the Administration for Community Living with analysis and technical assistance support. ACL strives to ensure that all people, regardless of age and disability, live with dignity, make their own choices and participate fully in society.

So I strongly suggest that we just erase that myth." However, developing a more robust awareness will not be sufficient to address the disconnect between myth and reality. Alkema asked the workshop participants to create and implement new tools, systems of care, and policies to address the growing needs of older adults and those with disabilities. She cautioned not to focus on the negative elements of these challenges but rather to focus on the positive side, which is that this is an opportunity to create a new reality with better systems of care, better policies, and better programs. All Americans—including people with disabilities and older adults—should be able to live at home with the supports they need, participating in communities that value their contributions.

Department of Health and Human Services created a new organization, the Administration for Community Living . Showing results 1-25 of 80 for Administration for Community Living federal grants, government grants and loans. For detailed information on a Administration for Community Living federal grant including eligibility requirements or financial assistance, click the title. By funding services and supports provided primarily by networks of community-based organizations, and with investments in research, education, and innovation, ACL helps make this principle a reality for millions of Americans.

The many contributors involved in the HCL project took part in a highly engaged and interactive process called Participatory Curriculum Development to adapt and create the two workshop curriculums. PCD is an approach to work in collaboration with and foster relationships between researchers and people interested in creating useful products and resources that can benefit people living in their communities. By using the PCD process, teams of stakeholders and researchers worked side-by-side to develop the Healthy Community Living Program. ​Now called Living Well in the Community, the updated Living Well with a Disability 5th edition curriculum sits within the overarching Healthy Community Living program. Paired with a brand new curriculum called Community Living Skills, the HCL program answers the call from service providers for fresh and up-to-date health and Independent Living skills training.

Our division works closely with a number of boards and councils around the Commonwealth to better serve our clients. One example is our partnership with the Virginia Statewide Independent Living Council. The SILC works to increase the impact of Independent Living services in Virginia. The Council is composed of gubernatorial appointees who represent people with disabilities across the state, the interests of CILs, and Independent Living programs and services. A three-year grant to the Virginia Department for Aging and Rehabilitative Services aims to help prevent falls, the leading cause of injuries and deaths from injury among older Americans. The $554,525 grant from the federal Administration for Community Living will expand Virginia's falls prevention programs for older adults, including those with early dementia.

In addition to increasing the availability of the workshops and prevention awareness among the Commonwealth's roughly 1.2 million adults over age 65, the grant will help establish a coalition to spearhead a concerted effort to substantially reduce the threat. No Wrong Door Virginia is a national leader, supporting older adults, family caregivers and individuals of all ages with disabilities. The system provides valuable tools to strengthen community networks and promote person-centered practices, for individuals to evaluate options and make informed decisions. Our Office for Disability Programs offers a variety of services to which allow individuals with the most severe disabilities to live independently in the community.

Https Twitter Com Account Verify Userinfo

In the case of the authorization code flow, an attacker can potentially steal the victim's code before it is used. They can then send this code to the client application's legitimate /callback endpoint to get access to the user's account. In this scenario, an attacker does not even need to know the client secret or the resulting access token. In any OAuth flow, the user must approve the requested access based on the scope defined in the authorization request.

The resulting token allows the client application to access only the scope that was approved by the user. But in some cases, it may be possible for an attacker to "upgrade" an access token with extra permissions due to flawed validation by the OAuth service. Note that for the implicit grant type, stealing an access token doesn't just enable you to log in to the victim's account on the client application. As the entire implicit flow takes place via the browser, you can also use the token to make your own API calls to the OAuth service's resource server.

This may enable you to fetch sensitive user data that you cannot normally access from the client application's web UI. This endpoint returns access tokens, ID tokens, and refresh tokens depending on the request parameters. For password, client credentials, saml2 assertion Early Access, and refresh token flows, calling /token is the only step of the flow. For the authorization code flow, calling /token is the second step of the flow.

An application must have authenticated with Keycloak and have received an access token. This access token will need to have the broker client-level role read-token set. This means that the user must have a role mapping for this role and the client application must have that role within its scope. In this case, given that you are accessing a protected service in Keycloak, you need to send the access token issued by Keycloak during the user authentication.

In the broker configuration page you can automatically assign this role to newly imported users by turning on the Stored Tokens Readable switch. By stealing a valid code or token, the attacker may be able to access the victim's data. Ultimately, this can completely compromise their account - the attacker could potentially log in as the victim user on any client application that is registered with this OAuth service. When an OIDC access token or SAML assertion is created, all the user role mappings of the user are, by default, added as claims within the token or assertion. Applications use this information to make access decisions on the resources controlled by that application. In Keycloak, access tokens are digitally signed and can actually be re-used by the application to invoke on other remotely secured REST services.

The oauth provider supports the authorization code flow. You can configure OAuth parameters in one place, and Ktor will automatically make a request to a specified authorization server with the necessary parameters. OAuth 2.0 is the successor to OAuth 1.0, and is designed to overcome perceived shortcomings in the earlier version. The user is first redirected to the service provider to authorize access.

After authorization has been granted, the user is redirected back to the application with a code that can be exchanged for an access token. The application requesting access, known as a client, is identified by an ID and secret. By default, each new client application has an unlimited role scope mappings. This means that every access token that is created for that client will contain all the permissions the user has. If the client gets compromised and the access token is leaked, then each system that the user has permission to access is now also compromised. It is highly suggested that you limit the roles an access token is assigned by using the Scope menu for each client.

Or alternatively, you can set role scope mappings at the Client Scope level and assign Client Scopes to your client by using theClient Scope menu. If an access token or refresh token is compromised, the first thing you should do is go to the admin console and push a not-before revocation policy to all applications. This will enforce that any tokens issued prior to that date are now invalid. Now Keycloak is going to check if the response from the identity provider is valid. If valid, it will import and create a new user or just skip that if the user already exists. If it is a new user, Keycloak may ask the identity provider for information about the user if that info doesn't already exist in the token.

If the user already exists Keycloak may ask him to link the identity returned from the identity provider with the existing account. What exactly is done is configurable and can be specified by setup of First Login Flow. At the end of this step, Keycloak authenticates the user and issues its own token in order to access the requested resource in the service provider. The client scope roles is not defined in the OpenID Connect specification and it is also not added automatically to the scopeclaim in the access token.

Clients are entities that can request authentication of a user. The first type of client is an application that wants to participate in single-sign-on. These clients just want Keycloak to provide security for them. The other type of client is one that is requesting an access token so that it can invoke other services on behalf of the authenticated user.

This section discusses various aspects around configuring clients and various ways to do it. Once it has received the data, the client application uses it in place of a username to log the user in. The access token that it received from the authorization server is often used instead of a traditional password. OAuth service provider - The website or application that controls the user's data and access to it. They support OAuth by providing an API for interacting with both an authorization server and a resource server. OAuth 1.0 is a delegated authentication strategy that involves multiple steps.

Next, the user is redirected to the service provider to authorize access. Finally, after authorization has been granted, the user is redirected back to the application and the request token can be exchanged for an access token. The application requesting access, known as a consumer, is identified by a consumer key and consumer secret. Then to ensure that client applications won't accept the tokens signed by the compromised key, you should update and push not-before policy for the realm, which is doable from the admin console.

Note that your REST and confidential clients must have set Admin URL, so that Keycloak is able to send them the request about pushed not-before policy. The scope parameter contains the string, with the scope values divided by space . The value openid is the meta-value used for all OpenID Connect requests, so we will ignore it for this example. The token will contain mappers and role scope mappings from the client scopes profile, email and phone . Keycloak is a separate server that you manage on your network.

Applications are configured to point to and be secured by this server. Keycloak uses open protocol standards like OpenID Connector SAML 2.0 to secure your applications. Browser applications redirect a user's browser from the application to the Keycloak authentication server where they enter their credentials. This redirection is important because users are completely isolated from applications and applications never see a user's credentials. Applications instead are given an identity token or assertion that is cryptographically signed.

These tokens can have identity information like username, address, email, and other profile data. They can also hold permission data so that applications can make authorization decisions. These tokens can also be used to make secure invocations on REST-based services.

You configure a request for token validation, getting scopes and scope details, authorization redirect, access token, or refresh token that meets the specifications of the custom provider. In Access Policy Manager® (APM®), the request object enables configuration of requests to meet the requirements of your OAuth providers. The object supports requests for scope permission, scope data, authorization redirect, tokens, and OpenID Connect UserInfo. It specifies the HTTP method, parameters, and headers to use for the specific type of request. For the implicit grant type, the access token is sent via the browser, which means an attacker can steal tokens associated with innocent client applications and use them directly. Once they have stolen an access token, they can send a normal browser-based request to the OAuth service's /userinfo endpoint, manually adding a new scope parameter in the process.

With the authorization code grant type, the user's data is requested and sent via secure server-to-server communication, which a third-party attacker is typically not able to manipulate directly. However, it may still be possible to achieve the same result by registering their own client application with the OAuth service. The state parameter should ideally contain an unguessable value, such as the hash of something tied to the user's session when it first initiates the OAuth flow. This value is then passed back and forth between the client application and the OAuth service as a form of CSRF token for the client application. Therefore, if you notice that the authorization request does not send a state parameter, this is extremely interesting from an attacker's perspective.

It potentially means that they can initiate an OAuth flow themselves before tricking a user's browser into completing it, similar to a traditional CSRF attack. This can have severe consequences depending on how OAuth is being used by the client application. In the implicit flow, this POST request is exposed to attackers via their browser. As a result, this behavior can lead to a serious vulnerability if the client application doesn't properly check that the access token matches the other data in the request. In this case, an attacker can simply change the parameters sent to the server to impersonate any user.

In this flow, the access token is sent from the OAuth service to the client application via the user's browser as a URL fragment. The client application then accesses the token using JavaScript. The trouble is, if the application wants to maintain the session after the user closes the page, it needs to store the current user data somewhere. After receiving an access token, the client application requests this data from the resource server, typically from a dedicated /userinfo endpoint.

OAuth 2.0 is a framework for obtaining access tokens for protected resources such as web APIs. OpenID Connect utilises the OAuth 2.0 semantics and flows to allow clients to access the user's identity, encoded in a JSON Web Token called ID token. The access token facilitates retrieval of consented profile details from theUserInfo endpoint of the OpenID provider. First of all, setting up an OAuth 2.0 server can be difficult , and using a single identity provider restricts your user.

A service like Auth0 comes in handy in such a situation. It allows us to use the many identity providers and the standard username-password login at the same time. Role Scope Mappings is a way to limit the roles that get declared inside an access token. When a client requests that a user be authenticated, the access token they receive back will only contain the role mappings you've explicitly specified for the client's scope. This allows you to limit the permissions each individual access token has rather than giving the client access to all of the user's permissions.

By default, each client gets all the role mappings of the user. Client scopes are entities in Keycloak, which are configured at the realm level and they can be linked to clients. The client scopes are referenced by their name when a request is sent to the Keycloak authorization endpoint with a corresponding value of the scope parameter. The details are described in the section about client scopes linking.

Default Client ScopesThis is applicable for both OpenID Connect and SAML clients. Default client scopes are always applied when issuing OpenID Connect tokens or SAML assertions for this client. The client will inherit Protocol mappers and Role Scope Mappings defined on the client scope. For the OpenID Connect Protocol, the Mappers and Role Scope Mappings are always applied, regardless of the value used for the scope parameter in the OpenID Connect authorization request.

The new client does not have any built-in mappers, however it usually inherits some mappers from the client scopes as described in the client scopes section. Protocol mappers map things like, for example, email address to a specific claim in the identity and access token. Their function should each be self explanatory from their name. There are additional pre-configured mappers that are not attached to the client that you can add by clicking the Add Builtin button. There is no refresh token returned and there is also no user session created on the Keycloak side upon successful authentication by default.

It is important to note that access tokens are usually short lived and often expired after only minutes. The additional refreshtoken that was transmitted by the login protocol allows the application to obtain a new access token after it expires. This refresh protocol is important in the situation of a compromised system. If access tokens are short lived, the whole system is only vulnerable to a stolen token for the lifetime of the access token. Future refresh token requests will fail if an admin has revoked access.

The default OAuth Logon Page agent displays messages that instruct the user to log in using an authorization code or a resource owner password credentials grant type. It displays option buttons from which users select the OAuth provider through whom they want to log in. With this access policy, the user logs on through a BIG-IP® system. The OAuth Client agent obtains an access token, and an OAuth Scope agent tries to retrieve the list of scopes associated with the token from the OAuth provider.

When the token expires, the system makes no attempt to refresh it. You configure a provider list for use with APM configured as an OAuth resource server. A provider list enables a single OAuth Scope agent in an access policy to validate tokens issued by multiple OAuth providers. Configure requests for token validation, getting scopes and scope details, authorization redirect, access token, or refresh token to meet the specifications of the provider. Once you identify which other pages you are able to set as the redirect URI, you should audit them for additional vulnerabilities that you can potentially use to leak the code or token.

For the authorization code flow, you need to find a vulnerability that gives you access to the query parameters, whereas for the implicit grant type, you need to extract the URL fragment. As we've already mentioned, the OAuth specification is relatively loosely defined. This is especially true with regard to the implementation by the client application.

There are a lot of moving parts in an OAuth flow, with many optional parameters and configuration settings in each grant type, which means there's plenty of scope for misconfigurations. The client application receives a unique access token that proves they have permission from the user to access the requested data. Exactly how this happens varies significantly depending on the grant type. This is to ensure the token responseis compliant with the OAuth 2.0 spec. For basic OpenID authentication requests where only an ID token is requested this access token is nominal and may be safely ignored. The access token however comes into play when also requesting access to user profile data at the UserInfo endpoint.

N/A id_token code Claims associated with requested scopes. Claims associated with the requested scopes The full set of claims for the requested scopes is available via the /oauth2/v1/userinfo endpoint. The claims requested by the profile, email, address, and phone scope values are returned from the /userinfo endpoint when a response_type value is used that results in an access token being issued.